A while ago, following a line fault I wrote about why BT TotalCare is a total waste of money. I’m sad to say, following a line fault, the situation has not improved. This time, they fixed the fault in what I suppose is a reasonable period of time – that, you would have thought, was the hard part. But their customer communication (which you would have thought was the easy bit) was dreadful.

Once again, here’s the promise from BT’s own web site on TotalCare (with my emphasis):

Have you considered how much it would cost your business if your Business Phone Lines went down even for a short time? In lost customers, lost revenue, customer dis-satisfaction? … BT will respond within 4 hours of receiving your fault report and if the fault is not cleared during this period, we will advise you of progress.

And from another BT site (again my emphasis):

We guarantee to resolve a “Service Failure” in line with the care/service level you have chosen. For Total Care, this means 24 Hours after you report the fault, unless you have requested specific appointment date. The Total Care working week is 7 Days a week, 52 weeks per year.

What actually happened is:

  • I reported the fault at 17:55 yesterday (and, to be clear, the woman who took the call was helpful).
  • BT’s web based fault tracker never indicated any change until the fault was fixed, but suggested I rang BT for an update.
  • When I rang BT, I was effectively told off, and told (wrongly) that this was a 24 hour response service, not a 4 hour response service.
  • I received only one update from BT, and that was 16 hours and 50 minutes after the fault was reported, and was out of date.

A little digging suggests that whilst the 24 hour ‘guarantee’ is encoded in the contractual documentation (albeit with more holes in than a colander), the four hour response ‘promise’ is nowhere to be found. So, potential buyers of BT TotalCare, beware:

  • The marketing material might say you get a 4 hour response time, but contractually this appears to mean nothing (corrections from BT welcome).
  • As far as I can tell on any recent fault I’ve had, nothing substantive has ever happened out of business hours, even when the fault is at the exchange.
  • Don’t think you will actually get any useful fault updates from BT at all. That’s not to say they won’t fix the line (they did, and within the 24 hours, unlike last time when they claimed they couldn’t work in the dark), just in their own good time. I mean it’s not as if you’re paying extra for this, is it? Oh. Yes you are.

If it wasn’t for the fact BT owns very nearly all the copper infrastructure in the UK, I’d change providers. As it is, I’m stuck with them.

I’ve started keeping diaries of BT faults (obsessional? me?), so anyone really interested in the gory details can click on ‘Page 2’ below.

4 responses to “Why BT TotalCare still sucks”

  1. You know if you build big enough case you could complain to ofcom. Or in fact just saying ofcom to them might scare them enough

    1. OFCOM regulates competition issues. The way to get regulatory revenge is to make a complaint, get a deadlock notice, then go to ADR. Or failing that the Office of the Telecommunications Ombudsman. But BT have fixed this particular issue, and what I want is a service that gets fixed reliably next time it goes wrong. I suspect I’m more of a pain being the third hit on Google if you search for “BT TotalCare”. Mind you, the 4th hit is an OFT complaint …

  2. Hi, I know we are only ordinary Bt customers but our broaband died on the 6th Jan and then due to a nearby lightening strike on the 7th Jan we lost the phone we still haven’t got either back [ I had to go and buy a mobile broadband hotspot] as you can imagine there is a great deal more information to go with this but on the whole I believe your opinion that BT sucks is a very polite way of putting it!!!!!!!

  3. the ombudsman has an average £80 payout when they find in your favour.
    Considering that people are not going to bother to complain about tiny things…
    An example:-
    They had speciifed the wrong equipment and so couldnt fit a digital exchange with 2 incoming lines and also a remote worker down the broadband. It would have been a business critical service, but 7 months later they havent sorted it and so the new business which needed it has gone down the drain and there is one less person employed fulltime.
    The ombudsman offered £200 not in compensation but goodwill payment if I gave up all rights to other compensation from them breaking their own contract.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Alex Bligh's blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading